Bampton Lectures

The Bampton Lectures at the University of Oxford, England, were founded by a bequest of John Bampton,.[1] They have taken place since 1780.

They were a series of annual lectures; since the turn of the 20th century they have typically been biennial. They continue to concentrate on Christian theological topics. The lectures are traditionally been published in book form. On a number of occasions, notably at points during the 19th century, they attracted great interest and controversy.

Contents

Lecturers (incomplete list)

1780–1799

1800–1824

1825–1849

1850–1874

1875–1899

1900–1949

1950–1999

2000–

Notes

  1. ^ [1]. Bampton bequeathed funds for the annual preaching of eight divinity lecture sermons on the leading articles of the Christian faith, of which 30 copies are to be printed for distribution among the heads of houses. [2]. Date accessed: 20 December 2006.
  2. ^ Dictionary of National Biography, article Holmes, Robert (1748–1805).
  3. ^ [3]; in book form as A comparison of Islam and Christianity in their history, their evidence and their effects (1784).
  4. ^ [4]
  5. ^ Biography: Anonymous on Rev. Henry Kett
  6. ^ His 1801 Bampton Lectures Horae Mosaicae makes one tantalising reference to geology "while the bowels of the earth are ransacked to convince the literary world of the erroneousness of the Mosaical Chronology."[5] In volume I Faber argued that pagan accounts of creation, the Deluge, and the period from the Deluge to the Exodus confirmed the truth of Moses’ writings.[6], note 219.
  7. ^ Nares used de Luc to support a conservative stance in his 1805 Bamptons, which was still sympathetic to geology unlike his later works.[7]
  8. ^ Against the views of Edward Evanson. PDF, pp. 26–29.
  9. ^ He affirmed that correct interpretation depended on a due reverence for Scripture as a work of divine inspiration and on a willingness to obey and believe what was learned from Scripture. He insisted on the absolute authority of Scripture over tradition (especially the Catholic Church and Pope), human reason, and supposed direct communications from God; Scripture must be interpreted from Scripture.[8]
  10. ^ Dictionary of Welsh Biography, The National Library of Wales.
  11. ^ Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Goddard, Charles (1769/70–1848), Church of England clergyman by W. M. Jacob.
  12. ^ Google Books
  13. ^ Strongly attacked by John Henry Newman's pamphlet Elucidations of Dr. Hampden's Theological Statements[9].
  14. ^ Bishop Shirley died, having given only two of the lectures
  15. ^ The Bampton Lectures for 1848 were given by another Evangelical, Edward G. Marsh, a former Fellow of Oriel, and now incumbent of Aylesford, Kent.[10]
  16. ^ Concise Dictionary of National Biography
  17. ^ After one of the most comprehensive and learned reviews of the history of the doctrine, he came out infavor of a qualified millennialist view. Papal Rome is certainly the mystical Babylon, and although its fall has not yet truly taken place, it is shortly to be expected. ((PDF)
  18. ^ The book is the last statement, by a great English Protestant theologian, of a world of divinity which henceforth vanished except in the scholastic manuals. (PDF)
  19. ^ Wright, George Frederick
  20. ^ In his Bampton Lectures of 1884 he defended the proposition that the physical operation of the universe was determined, implying that God does not interfere with it. Temple asserted that God's superintendence of the world, including the evolution of life, was guaranteed through God's original creative decree. In his view the theory of evolution left the argument for an intelligent creator stronger than before.[11]
  21. ^ For many years the Bampton Lectures at Oxford had been considered as adding steadily and strongly to the bulwarks of the old orthodoxy. [...] But now there was an evident change. The departures from the old paths were many and striking, until at last, in 1893, came the lectures on Inspiration by the Rev. Dr. Sanday, Ireland Professor of Exegesis in the University of Oxford. In these, concessions were made to the newer criticism, which at an earlier time would have driven the lecturer not only out of the Church but out of any decent position in society ...[12]
  22. ^ http://www.ox.ac.uk/gazette/2008-9/weekly/150109/diry.htm

External links